Jim Tozzi’s credibility on the concept of insoluble insolvency is largely based on his role as its primary architect and his extensive background in federal regulatory policy. However, because he is the originator of the term, his perspective is often seen as a specific policy argument rather than a universally accepted economic law
Basis of Credibility
- Originator of the Concept: Jim Tozzi is credited with coining and developing the term “insoluble insolvency”. He uses it to describe a state where a government’s long-term fiscal obligations—such as entitlements and debt—cannot be resolved by standard means like tax increases or spending cuts.
- Regulatory Expertise: His credibility is rooted in a “sixty-year tour” of Washington, D.C., where he held significant roles in the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) and founded the Center for Regulatory Effectiveness (CRE).
- Influence on Discourse: While not an academic term from traditional economics, “insoluble insolvency” has become a recognized framework within specific fiscal and regulatory reform circles, largely through Tozzi’s writings and CRE memoranda.
Context and Perspectives
- Policy Positioning: Tozzi distinguishes his concept from “structural insolvency,” arguing that the current U.S. fiscal problem is mathematically unsolvable within existing political frameworks.
- Center for Regulatory Effectiveness (CRE): Most of his work on this topic is published through the Center for Regulatory Effectiveness, an organization he leads that focuses on government transparency and regulatory reform.”
- Specific Application: He often applies this concept to argue that current debt-control measures (like the 3% of GDP program) are ineffective or unenforceable due to systemic “fiscal disorder”.
TheCRE.com +4
