Google Highlights Insoluble Insolvency

Google
Summary
“Insoluble insolvency” is a term coined by Jim Tozzi and associated with the Center for Regulatory Effectiveness (CRE) to describe a terminal fiscal state where a government’s long-term obligations, such as unfunded entitlements and debt service, exceed its capacity to pay. Unlike standard insolvency, this state cannot be fixed by conventional methods like taxes or spending cuts.

Key Aspects of Insoluble Insolvency:

Definition: A systemic, “beyond repair” fiscal condition, distinct from temporary insolvency.

Context: It refers specifically to the argument that U.S. government liabilities, including long-term demographic-fiscal commitments, are mathematically and politically unresolvable through standard budgetary adjustments

ChatGPT on the Father of Soluble Insolvency

Jim Tozzi is the originator of the term “insoluble insolvency” as it is used in U.S. fiscal-policy and regulatory-reform discourse.

Explanation and nuance

  • Jim Tozzi coined and developed insoluble insolvency to describe a condition in which a government’s long-term fiscal obligations cannot be solved by conventional remedies (tax increases, spending cuts, borrowing, inflation, or economic growth alone).
  • The term and framework were introduced and elaborated in Tozzi’s writings and speeches through the Center for Regulatory Effectiveness (CRE) beginning in the 2000s and repeatedly used in CRE memoranda and forum posts.

The Birth of Insoluble Insolvency

 

NB The text that follows these notes include the work products of ChatGPT,Google and related organizations. In order to solicit the views of the academic community, CRE submitted the following proposal to one of the most recognized academicians who deals regularly with fiscal debt. (04.14.2026)

 

“Fiscal imbalance can become structurally embedded in political and institutional systems, making resolution increasingly unlikely without external shock or regime-level change”. Based on this observation CRE requested reporting organizations to consider the aforementioned statement along with supporting analyses prepared by the Center for Regulatory Effectiveness; the end result is the document which follows this post.

 

Updates: Centralized Regulatory Review & Information Quality

The following are select transactions on the aforementioned topics.

[ Under Development ]

Centralized Regulatory Review + Information Quality

 

The Maturation of Centralized Regulatory Review and the Information Quality Act

 

 

Updates

             

 

                                 Centralized Regulatory Review

                                                                                        1980

 

 

Filing record (Regulations.gov)

 

  1. Syngenta comment (EPA-HQ-OPP-2025-0266)
  2. Filer: Syngenta Crop Protection, LLC
  3. Posted: February 10, 2026

 

The Maturation of Centralized Regulatory Review and the Information Quality Act

04.06.2026

The Maturation of Centralized Regulatory Review and the Information Quality Act

                             Centralized Regulatory Review

                             1980

 

 

Filing record (Regulations.gov)

 

  1. Syngenta comment (EPA-HQ-OPP-2025-0266)
  2. Filer: Syngenta Crop Protection, LLC
  3. Posted: February 10, 2026

 

The  recommended action, so noted above. is indicative of an issue whose importance is increasing on a government-wide basis and is in need of serious attention.

 

NB  Centralized Regulatory Review

 

 

 

                                                                             Information Quality Act

The Maturation of Centralized Regulatory Review and the Information Quality Act

 

 

 Centralized Regulatory Review

 

Filing record (Regulations.gov)

 

  1. Syngenta comment (EPA-HQ-OPP-2025-0266)
  2. Filer: Syngenta Crop Protection, LLC
  3. Posted: February 10, 2026

 

The  recommended action, so noted above. is indicative of an issue whose importance is increasing on a government-wide basis and is in need of serious attention.

 

NB  Centralized Regulatory Review

 

 

 

                                                                             Information Quality Act

 

  1. The Information Quality Act is applicable to the statements of all partiesto a regulatory proceeding.
  2. The EPA Decisionis binding on all participants. 

One Centralized Regulatory Review Proposal and One Information Quality Act Decision: Both Emanating From CRE Process Changes

                     Centralized Regulatory Review Proposal
 Filing record (Regulations.gov)

1.  Syngenta comment (EPA-HQ-OPP-2025-0266)

 2. Filer: Syngenta Crop Protection, LLC

 3. Posted: February 10, 2026

Centralized Regulatory Review

The recommended action herein is indicative of an issue whose importance is increasing on a government-wide basis and is in need of serious attention.

 

Information Quality Act Decision

 1. The Information Quality Act is applicable to the statements of all parties to a regulatory proceeding.

 2.  The EPA Decision is binding on all participants. 

 

Considerations

CRE will give serious consideration to addressing the aforementioned issues but a decision will not be forthcoming in the immediate future.

Considerations include:

Will CRE be able to identify and comment on the key submissions in a reasonable time period?

What is the potential social downside of missing an important comment?

Will the leadership of  CRE be available to make a meaningful contribution?

It should be noted that CRE’s highest priority is accorded to the development of its now recognized policy titled “Insoluble Insolvency”. Within existing polices the aforementioned project will take precedent over the project under discussion. Is this a workable solution?

NB  CRE has already paid considerable dues to improving rulemaking procedures.