See Regulatory Pacesetters for Additional Posts on Regulatory Policy

Regulatory Pacesetters

                          CRE on the EPA Science Initiative

CRE is not supportive of the EPA science initiative at this time because it creates a new regulatory regime without first exploiting to the fullest the existing regulatory regime which consists of the Data Access Act and the Data Quality Act.

With respect to the existing regulatory regime please note:

  1. OMB neutered the Data Access Act when it opined that the DAA only applied to reports which carry the effect and force of law.
  2. DOJ neutered the Data Quality Act when it declared that the denial of Requests for Correction were not judicially reviewable.

CRE  believes that actions should be taken to correct the aforementioned shortcomings  prior to initiating a new regulatory regime—particularly since they have  government-wide application in lieu of applying only to EPA.  If a void exists  fill it but only after you demonstrate that the above statutes do not correct the problem.

Finally CRE is  most interested in implementing programs that will withstand a change in Administrations. With respect to the Data Access Act, the UK has a far more expansive program than the US.  With respect to the Data Quality  Act, on May 2, the Administrative Law Section of the ABA sponsored a program on the Act, not one attorney questioned the statement that the Data Quality Act is judicially reviewable under the Administrative Procedure Act.

The aforementioned statues have been on the books for two decades and have been shunned by both Democratic and Republication Administrations; the EPA proposal follows lockstep with the actions of its predecessors with respect to ignoring two statues which address the subject area of interest.

Leave a Reply

Please Answer: *