Editor’s Note: The following comment was submitted to Professor Dan Farber regarding the post that is printed below.
You most certainly are correct that OIRA is overworked and understaffed. I disagree, however, completely with your conclusions regarding the expertise of OIRA staff.
OIRA has been in business for more than three decades and if you look at the staff expertise over that period of time I believe you will arrive at a different conclusion.
A case in point is my background, having been instrumental in the formation of OIRA. I have a PhD in economics and a B. S. in chemical engineering; I have been admitted to the American Men and Women of Science and I worked as an operations research analyst.
The many talented OIRA employees who followed me have comparable backgrounds.
Note to CRE Readers: For a daily report on CRE activities please see http://www.thecre.com/oira/?p=2661
Dan Farber February 19, 2014
OIRA is staffed by under-trained, over-worked short-termers.
- Staffing levels have been cut by almost half since the office’s heyday under Reagan.
- Although the office’s main function is supervising cost-benefit analysis, only a handful of staffers have economics Ph.Ds. ”The most common degree is a master’s degree in public affairs, public policy or public administration. There is also considerable expertise, in statistics, law, information technology and environmental science.”
- The office has five sections: statistical and science policy; food, health and labor; transportation and security; natural resources and environment; and information policy. (Even that is more than you can find out from OIRA’s website)
- The desk officers who superintend particular rules are in their 20s or early 30s — in other words, not very experienced. On average, they stay four or five years, so their opportunity to acquire expertise is limited.
- “The pay isn’t bad. Many OIRA staffers listed on recent White House meeting records were making upward of $100,000 in 2012.” But hours are long, and the workload is heavy.
The key takeaway is that OIRA has far less expertise or time to learn the details of particular issues than the staff of EPA. OIRA may fill the gap by outsourcing some of the work to economists elsewhere in the federal government. But it’s easy to see why agency heads and cabinet officers don’t have much respect for OIRA’s expertise