May 30, 2013

Economic Impact of Expected Ozone Regulations Cause Concern

From: The Hill/RegWatch

Oil industry frets over new smog standard

By Julian Hattem

The oil and gas industry is pushing back against an expected Obama administration rule to tighten smog standards that public health groups say could save thousands of lives.

Cities and towns are still struggling to comply with a 2008 standard, the industry argues, and any new regulations could amount to the equivalent of “closed-for-business signs” across as much as 97 percent of the places Americans live.

The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) first proposed new standards for ozone pollution in 2010, but the White House overrode the agency and delayed the standards, a decision met with scorn by environmental and public health groups.

The proposal would have significantly tightened standards for ozone, the primary component of smog, but was strongly opposed by congressional Republicans and business groups who pointed to an EPA estimation that it could cost as much as $90 billion per year.

President Obama said that the rule could constitute a regulatory burden for the still-struggling economy, especially since the EPA was already scheduled to review the standard in 2013.

The EPA is expected to issue a new proposal later this year.

The gas and oil industry is worried that it will hurt businesses and could send the country back into recession without increasing public health.

“These could be the costliest EPA regulations ever,” Howard Feldman, the American Petroleum Institute’s director of regulatory and scientific affairs, told reporters on Thursday.

Current ozone standards allow for 75 parts-per-billion, but 46 areas across the country have not yet met that limit.

“We think those areas should be working on achieving the 2008 standard before we change the standard now — before we even consider changing it now,” Feldman  said.

When the White House pulled the plug on the EPA’s proposal in 2011, the agency was seeking a standard of 70 parts-per-billion.

If the standard is reduced to 60 parts-per-billion, as some of the EPA’s advisory committees have proposed, even “pristine locations” like Yellowstone National Park might not meet it, Feldman warned.

Health groups including the American Lung Association and the American Medical Association have disagreed, and in 2010 said that the 60 parts-per-billion level “will provide the  strongest protection for public health.”

Last year, a study partly funded by the EPA found that the lowest standard  could prevent up to nearly 8,000 premature deaths each year.

No Comments »

No comments yet.

Leave a Reply

Name not required for anonymous comments. Email is optional and will not be published.