Regulatory Watchdogs

Center for Regulatory Effectiveness

Greenpeace International
Public Citizen
Sierra Club

Center for Auto Safety
Center for Science in the Public Interest
Clean Air Trust
Electronic Privacy Information Center
Environmental Defense
ETC Group
FM Watch
Friends of the Earth
PR Watch
State Public Interest Research Groups
U.S. Public Interest Research Groups


Time to Regulate Google?
Should Google's provision of information services be regulated? Yes, if the decision is based on Google's own standards for determining whether to regulate tele-information companies.

In recent comments to the FCC, Google described "broadband openness" rules, aka net neutrality, as a "fundamental necessity." Without such rules, the search engine giant, aka Big Search, fears that broadband providers would "promote only their own pecuniary interests over the far broader interests of Internet users…."

As the Wall Street Journal noted last year, however, Google engages in the same type of discriminatory service practices they want the federal government to prohibit other companies from engaging in. Google Voice is a call forwarding service that allows users to have a single phone number that can reach all of their handsets (work, home, mobile, etc.). Instead of operating in an open, neutral manner, the WSJ explains that Google "is systematically blocking calls to phone numbers in some rural areas" that cost more to connect. Telcos are required by the FCC to complete those rural calls. Apparently Google has no objections to using discriminatory telecom practices to promote their own pecuniary interests.

The question of whether to regulate Google is not new. As reported, the Minority Media and Telecommunications Council has already raised the question as to whether net neutrality regulations should be applied to Google.

Google told the Commission that "[b]roadband is far too leave it solely to a failed market..." The unanswered question is what market failure? As The Economist explains, market failure occurs when "a market left to itself does not allocate resources efficiently. Interventionist politicians usually allege market failure to justify their interventions." Google has made no demonstration that broadband resources are not efficiently allocated. To the contrary, the company's rent-seeking activities to maximize their shareholder value could well result in a less efficient allocation of bandwidth.

Should Google be regulated? Only by their own standards. By the standards of Executive Order 12866, the FCC has no basis for subjecting any company to new Title II/net neutrality regulation.

See Google's Reply Comments

See WSJ, "Google Exceptionalism"

See, "Do Search Engines (Google) 'Harm Minority Owned Businesses'?"

CRE Homepage