Florida Official Sends Back $1M

By Jim Saunders, Health News Florida

Florida has a huge budget hole, and nobody truly knows whether the federal health-care overhaul will be upheld or killed by the Supreme Court.

But state Insurance Commissioner Kevin McCarty is taking his chances.

After a Pensacola judge’s ruling that the overhaul is unconstitutional, McCarty said Tuesday he will forfeit a $1 million federal grant that was supposed to go toward beefing up oversight of health-insurance rates.

Emergency regulation gives California teeth to enforce health insurance payouts

From: Fresno Bee

By Bobby Caina Calvan

Insurance Commissioner Dave Jones has won approval for an emergency regulation that gives him authority to enforce a new federal rule requiring health insurers to spend at least 80 percent of premiums on medical care.

Until now, state regulators were limited to enforcing a 70 percent “medical-loss ratio.” But as of Jan. 1, California’s standard has been superceded by the federal health care law that requires insurers to comply with the higher level.

Under the new law, insurers who fail to comply with the minimum medical-loss ratio this year must issue refunds next year to customers who buy insurance on their own.

Obamacare and Federal Health Exchanges: Undermining State Flexibility

From: The Heritage Foundation

by Robert Moffit, Ph.D.

With enactment of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (PPACA), states “shall” establish a health insurance exchange in accordance with federal rules and guidelines. If a state chooses not to establish an exchange, the federal government will step in and set up such an exchange for that state.

Summary

Feds Vow to Fight Blue Shield Premium Hikes

State Officials Also Probing Series of Rate Increases – Some as High as 59% – by Calif. Insurer

(AP)  LOS ANGELES – U.S. Health and Human Services Secretary Kathleen Sebelius and California Insurance Commissioner Dave Jones are vowing to push back against massive health insurance rate hikes proposed by Blue Shield of California.

Blue Shield has implemented two rate hikes since Oct. 1 and plans another for March 1. Some policyholders would pay 59 percent more in premiums cumulatively over the three increases.

It barks, but will it bite?

From: ModernHealthCare.com

While HHS can review proposed insurance premium increases, it lacks the authority to actually stop them

By Rebecca Vesely
The obvious question is: Where’s the teeth? On Dec. 21, HHS issued proposed regulations that will require health insurers to disclose and justify premium rate increases of 10% or more starting in July. But the federal government—along with most states—lacks the authority to reject insurance premium increases. Instead, federal and state officials say they hope increased transparency and publicity about soaring premiums will help dissuade insurers from jacking up rates.

“Ultimately, we believe the bright light of sunshine will convince more insurers to think twice and check their math before submitting large rate hikes, which means the benefits of these new rules will be felt by millions of Americans,” HHS Secretary Kathleen Sebelius said at a news conference announcing the proposed regulations. On the surface, that may seem like wishful thinking. From insurers’ perspective, big rate increases, especially in the individual and small-group markets, are a reflection of rising medical costs and sicker customers.