Issues

• Complaints
• Funding
• Governance
• MOU
• Responsiveness
• Transparency

CRE Interventions
•  Agency Administrative Actions
•  Rulemaking
•  Litigation

Government
•  Federal Computer Incident Response Center
•  National Infrastructure Protection Center
•  National Telecommunications and Information Administration
• US Department of Commerce
• US Office of Management and Budget

NGO's
•  Domain Name Rights Coalition
•  Electronics Frontiers Foundation
•  gTLD-MoU
•  ICANN at Large
•  Internet Society
•  The Non-Commercial Domain Name Holders Constituency

Technical Orgs
• CERT Coordination Center
• Internet Architecture Board
• Internet Assigned Numbers Authority
• Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers
• Internet Engineering Task Force
• Internet Mail Consortium
• Internet Research Task Center
• Requests for Comments Editor

 

Don't Bury the Bureaucrats
At a recent hearing on federal cybersecurity issues by the House Government Reform Committee, one witness warned that the Federal Information Security Management Act (FISMA), the federal government's primary cybersecurity statute, "might do nothing more than bury bureaucrats in paperwork."

The witness explained that FISMA's while emphasis on the certification and accreditation of computer systems may be useful for new IT systems, the law was difficult to apply to existing systems and "runs the risk of becoming a paperwork exercise."

According to an article on ComputerWeekly.com, witnesses stressed the need for the federal government to do more to promote cybersecurity both within and outside the government. One key issue discussed at the hearing was the need for authentication. Specifically, a senior official of one technology company stated that the government needed to push for internet tools such as the Domain Name System (DNS) and Border Gateway Protocol (BGP) to include authentication security. The lack of authentication in the DNS and BGP makes "it relatively easy for hackers to redirect internet traffic."

Although the hearing made clear the need for increased federal work on cybersecurity standards and related issues, this is not to say that the government is ignoring the need to improve cybersecurity. A senior official at the White House Office of Management and Budget (OMB) defended federal cybersecurity efforts and explained that "OMB is committed to a federal government with resilient information systems. The dangers posed by the internet must not be allowed to significantly affect agency business processes or disrupt services to the citizen."

Improving cybersecurity is far too important to the entire country to allow the debate over which steps to take next to devolve into a round of either blaming the bureaucrats or pointing fingers at industry. Instead, federal agencies, industry and other stakeholders need to work collaboratively to secure the internet. There is no alternative.

  • See ComputerWeekly.com article

  • Copyright © 2004 The Center for Regulatory Effectiveness.
    All rights reserved.