Regulatory Watchdogs


Center for Regulatory Effectiveness

Greenpeace International
Public Citizen
Sierra Club

Center for Auto Safety
Center for Science in the Public Interest
Clean Air Trust
Earthjustice
Electronic Privacy Information Center
Environmental Defense
ETC Group
FM Watch
Friends of the Earth
PR Watch
State Public Interest Research Groups
U.S. Public Interest Research Groups

Archives



Public Citizen Twists Study to Smear Bureaucrats
A new study in the New England Journal of Medicine by researchers at Harvard suggests that the drug approval timeframes included in the Prescription Drug User Fee Act (PDUFA) result in more safety problems once products are in clinical use.

Unfortunately, an official with Public Citizen twisted the studyís statistical findings to imply that FDA officials were corrupt. Specifically, a senior PC official is quoted as saying "So you have reviewers and scientists at the FDA who are dependent for their salaries in part upon the very industry who they're supposed to be regulating. That is a conflict of interest and, we think, is going to lead to less safe drugs getting on the market." PCís claim regarding the supposed impact of the PDUFA funding mechanism was not even part of the Harvard study.

Meanwhile, the FDA "did its own review and found no statistical difference in problems with drugs approved before, near or after deadline." The "head of FDA's Center for Drug Evaluation and Research said FDAís not obligated to meet" the PDUFA "deadlines Congress imposed and that the agencyís reviewers can take more time if they're concerned about safety." Moreover, the "agency also claims Harvardís numbers are off." The agencyís Economics Staff Director explained that "Because we have found at least two fundamental problems with their data, we don't think their conclusions hold up."

Investigating the safety effects, if any, of PDUFA is a legitimate topic of inquiry. Baselessly impugning the integrity of FDAís scientists and other officials, however, is simple sleaze thatís best left in the gutter where it belongs.

See NEJM Abstract

See NBC News story

 
 
 
 
 
CRE Homepage