Contact TheIPD.US



Regulatory Actions
View Public Comments
Submit Comments

NMFS ITA for Gulf of Mexico
NMFS Acoustic Guidelines
NMFS IHA for Scripps

Science
  Best Available Science on Acoustic Effects on Marine Mammals
  Seismic vs. Sonar
  Physical Effects
 Behavioral Effects
  Models
  Sound Propagation
  Mitigation
 Extrapolation From Terrestrial Mammal Acoustic Effects to Marine Mammals
  Cumulative and Synergistic Effects
 Indirect Effects

  NMFS
 MMS
 MMC
 NAS
  US Navy
 Sperm Whale Seismic Study
 ICES
 Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory Institute
 NRDC
 ACCOBAMS
 The Acoustic Ecology Institute
 ASCOBANS
 Fisheries and Oceans Canada
 Sakhalin Energy Investment Company Limited

Library
  Statutes
 Regulations
 Relevant NMFS Permits
 Major Studies and Reports

Comment on IPD
  Potential Research Projects
  Research Underway
  Structure of the IPD

CRE Interventions
  Agency Administrative Actions
  Rulemaking
  Litigation

 

Making Your Views Known On Marine Mammal Regulation

Soundings


MMC Questions Ability to Spot Marine Mammals Near Seismic Vessels
On July 29, 2010, the U.S. National Marine Fisheries Service published Federal Register notice of NMFS' Incidental Harassment Authorization under the U.S. Marine Mammal Protection Act. This IHA authorizes Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory (L-DEO), a part of Columbia University, to take small numbers of marine mammals, by harassment, incidental to conducting a marine geophysical survey at the Shatsky Rise in the northwest Pacific Ocean, July through September, 2010.

A notice of receipt of the L-DEO application and proposed IHA was published in the Federal Register on May 21, 2010 (75 FR 28568). During the comment period, NMFS received comments from the U.S. Marine Mammal Commission. MMC's comments can be found online at: http://www.nmfs.noaa.gov/pr/permits/incidental.htm. MMC questioned whether NMFS' monitoring requirements in the IHA were "sufficient to detect with a high level of confidence, all marine mammals within or entering the identified exclusion zones" around the seismic vessels.

NMFS responded to MMC's question as follows:

    "NMFS believes that the planned monitoring program will be sufficient to detect (using visual detection and PAM [passive acoustic monitoring]), with reasonable certainty, most marine mammals within or entering identified exclusion zones (EZs). This monitoring, along with the required mitigation measures, will result in the least practicable adverse impact on the affected species or stocks and will result in a negligible impact on the affected species or stocks.

    " At present, NMFS views the combination of visual and passive acoustic monitoring as the most effective mitigation techniques available for detecting marine mammals within or entering the exclusion zone. L-DEO and the federal funding agency (NSF) are receptive to incorporating proven technologies and techniques to enhance the current monitoring and mitigation program. Until proven technological advances are made, nighttime mitigation measures during operations include combinations of the use of protected species visual observers (PSVOs), PAM, night vision devices, and continuous shooting of a mitigation gun. Should the airgun array be powered-down, it is believed that the operation of a single airgun continues to serve as a sound source deterrent to marine mammals. In the event of a complete airgun array shut down, for mitigation or repairs, then science is suspended until one half hour after civil dawn (when PSO's are able to clear the safety zone). Science does not begin until the entire safety radius is visible for at least 30 minutes."
NMFS' response also points out that L-DEO will be evaluating and reporting on the efficacy of other monitoring techniques such as Night Vision Devices and handheld thermal imaging cameras. These devices are currently successfully utilized by another federal agency while conducting nighttime seismic operations.

Whether marine mammal monitoring techniques work has been a recurring comment and concern for MMC. NMFS seems to be exploring new ways of addressing this comment and concern.
  • Click here to read NMFS' Federal Register notice of and response to comments on the L-DEO IHA


  • FWS Seeks Public Comment on Polar Bear and Walrus ICR for the Chukchi, Beaufort and Alaskan Coast
    On July 19, 2010, the United States Fish and Wildlife Service published a Federal Register notice seeking public comment on an Information Collection Request relating to the effects of oil and gas activities on marine mammals in the Beaufort Sea and Chukchi Sea and the adjacent coast of Alaska. After receiving and reviewing public comment, FWS will send the ICR to OMB with whatever revisions are made in response to comment. OMB will then review the ICR and decide whether to approve it under the Paperwork Reduction Act. FWS cannot force anyone to provide the information covered by the ICR until and unless OMB approves the ICR and issues it a control number under the PRA. There will likely be another public comment period during OMB's review of the ICR.

    The current ICR for oil and gas activities in the Beaufort, Chukchi and adjacent Alaskan coast expires November 30, 2010. The ICR now open for comment replaces, rather than extends the current ICR. Like the current ICR, the proposed new ICR is intended to cover information that FWS believes is necessary to develop and enforce oil and gas "Take" mitigation provisions. FWS believes that these mitigation provisions are necessary to protect polar bears and walruses under the Marine Mammal Protection Act.

    FWS' Federal Register notice briefly describes the information covered by the ICR. It also provides FWS' view of the burden that this ICR would impose on respondents. FWS' notice also requests public comment on the following issues:

    "Whether or not the collection of information is necessary, including whether or not the information will have practical utility; The accuracy of our estimate of the burden for this collection of information;

    Ways to enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information to be collected; and

    Ways to minimize the burden of the collection of information on respondents."
    FWS must receive any comments on the ICR by September 20, 2010.
  • Click here to read FWS' Federal Register notice seeking comment




  •  
    Copyright © 2005 The Center for Regulatory Effectiveness.
    All rights reserved.