Author's details

Name: Jim Tozzi
Date registered: December 21, 2011

Latest posts

  1. The 340B Mega-Reg Is Dead — November 20, 2014
  2. Paperwork Reduction(?) Act — November 17, 2014
  3. State Farm ‘with Teeth’: Heightened Judicial Review in the Absence of Executive Oversight — November 13, 2014
  4. Book Review: Valuing Life: Humanizing the Regulatory State by Cass Sunstein — November 12, 2014
  5. Regulating through the Back Door at the Commodity Futures Trading Commission — November 10, 2014

Most commented posts

  1. Cyber Legislation Will Cost Businesses and Hurt Economy — 1 comment

Author's posts listings


The 340B Mega-Reg Is Dead

From: Mondaq

Article by Ellyn L. Sternfield | Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C.

With all due credit to the Coroner from the Wizard of Oz, like the Wicked Witch of the East crushed by Dorothy’s house, the 340B Drug Discount Program mega-reg is “not only merely dead, it’s really most sincerely dead.”  And to quote one of my favorite sports commentators, Tony Kornheiser, “I believe I had that.”


Paperwork Reduction(?) Act

Editor’s Note: For information on the purpose and value of the PRA process, see here. For Commissioner Clyburn’s remarks on the FCC being hampered by adherence to OMB’s PRA requirements, see here.

From: CommLawBlog

A recent notice about DTV construction permit applications got us thinking about our old friend, the PRA.

Has the FCC changed the process for applying for DTV construction permits? Probably not, but a recent notice in the Federal Register seemed to suggest otherwise. It turns out, though, that the real story here is the hypnotic effect of the Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA).


State Farm ‘with Teeth’: Heightened Judicial Review in the Absence of Executive Oversight

Editor’s Note: An interview with Professor Sharkey about the forthcoming paper is available here.

From: New York University Law Review, Vol. 89, 2014/NYU School of Law, Public Law Research Paper No. 14-15

Catherine M. Sharkey,New York University School of Law



Book Review: Valuing Life: Humanizing the Regulatory State by Cass Sunstein

From: The London School of Economics and Political Science/Review of Books

In Valuing Life, Cass Sunstein surveys a wide range of practical research and real-life policymaking in his characteristically lucid style, offering a candid and humble account of his administrative tenure in Washington. He performs an invaluable service in revealing how government regulators balance pragmatic concerns of resource scarcity with principled ideals of respect and dignity, writes Mark D. White.


Regulating through the Back Door at the Commodity Futures Trading Commission

Editor’s Note: The solution to backdoor regulation is the Data Quality Act.

From: Mercatus Center/George Mason University

Hester Peirce

The traditional method of regulating under the Administrative Procedure Act (APA)—the law that governs regulatory agency rulemaking—requires a notice-and-comment process, where the regulating agency informs the public of its proposed rule, seeks feedback from the public and interested parties, and performs a benefit-cost analysis of the proposed rule. These requirements boost public confidence in the regulatory process and allow regulated businesses to prepare for and understand new rules, which leads to better compliance.


A Closer Look: The [PA] Independent Regulatory Review Commission, with Chairman John Mizner

From: The PLS Reporter

Author: Josh Levy

“People don’t know that we actually do have a review process here in Pennsylvania that is unique among the 50 states, and there is no such thing in the federal government,” John Mizner, Esq., chairman of the Independent Regulatory Review Commission, told The PLS Reporter.

“We’re the most important commission in Harrisburg that no one has ever heard of,” Mizner remarked, even though “virtually everybody” is affected in some way by the regulations approved by the commission.



Supreme Court Regulatory Cases to Watch

Editor’s Note: An influential regulatory case to watch is Harkonen v. U.S. Dept. of Justice (No. 13-15197). CRE’s amicus brief is found at http://thecre.com/pdf/20130609_Harkonen_Armicus.pdf.

From: RegBlog/Penn Program on Regulation

A Facebook rapper, a bearded prisoner, and a red grouper fisherman will all figure into a highly anticipated Supreme Court term that includes several cases that may affect the American regulatory landscape.



Department of Energy Rules Take Longest For White House to Review, Data Indicate

Editor’s Note: For more information on OIRA participation in agency rulemaking, please see Proper and Desirable Intervention by the President in Agency Rulemaking.

From: BNA/Bloomberg | Daily Environment Report™

By Ari Natter

The White House Office of Management and Budget takes more than five months on average to review regulations crafted by the Energy Department, making the department’s rules the most delayed of all federal agencies, according to a Bloomberg BNA analysis of agency data.


Using a ‘foreign language shield’ to improve investment decision making

From: Top1000Funds.com

Introducing a “foreign language shield” into a decision-making process is a proven way of making better decisions, according to Cass Sunstein, the Robert Walmsey University Professor at Harvard Law School.


“If you’re an adviser, get the cost/benefit figures, the risk/return figures, the algorithms, up and running. It’s a great safeguard,” he said.

The term “foreign language shield” comes from the behavioural finance finding that speaking a foreign language has been shown to turn off the part of the brain that makes quick, intuitive and generally error-prone decisions.



New Zealand: Out of control – our red tape tangle

Editor’s Note: The following article is part of OMB Watch’s ongoing analysis of the centralized regulatory review function in other industrialized countries. For other articles on the subject, see here, here and here.

From: New Zealand Herald

Governments are passing tidal waves of rules with no idea of whether they’re worth it, says Robert MacCulloch.

by Robert MacCulloch

The regulatory state in New Zealand is on the march. The number of regulations made by governments each year from 1985 onward has shot up.

The numbers don’t include local government regulations because nobody has counted them.

Older posts «