TheCRE.com
CRE Homepage About The CRE Advisory Board Newsletter Search Links Representation Comments/Ideas
Reg Week Archives
Data Access
Data Quality
Regulation by Litigation
Regulation by Information
Regulation by Appropriation
Special Projects
CRE Watch List
Emerging Regulatory Issues
Litigation
OMB Papers
Abstracts and Reviews
Guest Column
Voluntary Standards Program
CRE Report Card
Public Docket Preparation
Interactive Public Docket
Electronic Regulatory Reform
Consumer Response Service
Site Search

WWW
CRE.com

Google

Relevant Sections of OMB Peer Guidelines

  • "Peer reviewers can make an important contribution by distinguishing scientific facts from professional judgments. Furthermore, where appropriate, reviewers should be asked to provide advice on the reasonableness of judgments made from the scientific evidence. However, the charge should make clear that the reviewers are not to provide advice on the policy (e.g., the amount of uncertainty that is acceptable or the amount of precaution that should be embedded in an analysis). Such consideration are the purview of the government." 70 Fed.Reg. 2664, 2669 1st col., Jan. 14, 2005 (footnote omitted).
  • "Peer reviewers shall be charged with reviewing scientific and technical matters, leaving policy determinations for the agency. Reviewers shall be informed of applicable access, objectivity, reproducibility and other quality standards under the Federal laws governing access and quality." Id. at 2675 1st & 2d col.
See OMB Peer Review Guidelines